Rhetoric 2.0

  • Archive
  • RSS

ON Quintilian’s lack of interest in ‘artificial memory’: “Has Roman society moved on into greater sophistication in which some intense, archaic, almost magical, immediate association of memory with images has been lost? Or is the difference a temperamental one? Would the artificial memory not work for Quintilian because he lacked the acute visual perceptions necessary for visual memorisation?” (Francis Yates, The Art of Memory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2001. 26)

    • #memory
    • #visual
    • #Quintilian
    • #association
  • 1 year ago
  • Permalink
Share

Short URL

TwitterFacebookPinterestGoogle+
← Previous • Next →

About

Rhetoric 2.0 is the ongoing commonplace book of Noah Brewer. Themes include an investigation of argumentation and narrative in the digital media environment.

Tag Cloud

Pages

  • About the Author
  • RSS
  • Random
  • Archive
  • Mobile
Effector Theme by Pixel Union